Decision made on controversial Hindu and Sikh crematorium plans for rural Harborough district village


The applicant claimed there was a “strong” religious need for the building, but fears of a lack of parking were raised.
The plan, by Ben Copeland of the CDS Group, first emerged last September for Scraptoft Lodge Farm in Keyham Lane, East Scraptoft. It looked to demolish a late 19th century farmhouse and outbuildings and replace it with a crematorium, while providing a dining hall and car parking.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe crematorium was designed specifically for Leicestershire’s Hindu and Sikh communities, but proved to be divisive with the public with more than 30 objections raised. Some raised fears over the design, while parking provisions and access to the site were also raised in opposition.
One opponent said: “Our primary concern centres on the anticipated traffic increase through an area already burdened with inadequate road infrastructure. The existing roads are narrow and poorly maintained, struggling to accommodate current traffic volumes. The addition of funeral processions and increased vehicle movements would exacerbate congestion and pose significant safety risks for both drivers and pedestrians.”
The development has plenty of backers too, with 56 letters of support submitted to Harborough District Council (HDC). One said: “This facility has the potential to enhance the quality of life in Leicestershire, ensuring that we honour our diverse communities while also taking meaningful strides toward environmental responsibility. I believe this project is essential for fostering inclusivity, meeting the needs of our growing population, and contributing to a more sustainable future.”
CDS’s plans also included two chapels for the site, expected to hold six ceremonies a day between them. Mr Copeland claimed there was a “strong” religious need for this type of faith-specific crematorium in the county.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHowever, Leicester City Council, who were consulted on the plans, believed the needs assessment in the plans was “misleading” and “significantly” overstated the case for cremation capacity at other existing sites in Leicestershire.
Amid the concerns, the application was “called in” – meaning the decision was made at a planning meeting – by HDC last week. Officers recommended to refuse the plan, saying the development’s location, scale, and design, would disrupt the character of the area. HDC believed the benefits associated with the plans would not outweigh this harm.